Legacies of Empire

Borders, migration and memory: how empire still shapes the world.

  • Define and explain Legacies of Empire in your own words
  • Use key terms such as Decolonisation accurately
  • Apply what you have learned to new examples and questions
  • Avoid the common mistakes learners make with this topic

This lesson focuses on Legacies of Empire: borders, migration and memory: how empire still shapes the world.

Definition: Legacies of Empire

Borders, migration and memory: how empire still shapes the world.

Key ideas

Freedom brought new challenges

New nations inherited borders drawn by empires, dividing peoples and sowing conflict — partition in 1947 caused massive displacement and violence. Yet independence also brought pride, democracy movements and new voices in world affairs. Historians debate whether decolonisation was a triumph, a tragedy, or — most often — both.

The Second World War broke the empires

The war bankrupted Britain, shattered the myth of European invincibility — Japan's 1942 capture of Singapore stunned the British Empire — and armed colonial soldiers who returned home demanding rights. Empires that survived the war could not afford, politically or financially, to keep their colonies by force.

Key term — Decolonisation: The process by which colonies gained independence from imperial rule, peaking between 1945 and the 1970s.

Worked example: Legacies of Empire

Name two factors that weakened European empires after 1945.

The financial ruin of the Second World War and the spread of anti-colonial nationalism (also: superpower pressure, the Atlantic Charter's promise of self-determination).

Answer: The financial ruin of the Second World War and the spread of anti-colonial nationalism (also: superpower pressure, the Atlantic Charter's promise of self-determination).

Common mistakes
  • Assuming independence solved everything New states faced artificial borders, economic dependence and political instability. Decolonisation began new histories; it did not end them.
  • Saying Britain simply 'gave' independence Independence was won through sustained pressure and struggle. 'Granting' independence misdescribes who drove the process.

Practice

Why did imperial borders cause problems after independence?
Empires drew lines ignoring local peoples.

Borders divided ethnic groups and forced rival peoples together, sowing conflict in new states.

What is decolonisation?
Think colonies becoming independent.

The process by which colonies gained independence from imperial rule.

In which year did India gain independence, and what was partition?
The year is 1947.

1947; partition was the division of British India into independent India and Pakistan.

Who was Kwame Nkrumah?
Think Ghana, 1957.

The nationalist leader who led Ghana (the Gold Coast) to independence in 1957, the first sub-Saharan African colony to do so.

Quick check

Legacies of Empire — quick check

Which of these best defines "Decolonisation"?

The process by which colonies gained independence from imperial rule, peaking between 1945 and the 1970s.

What is the historians' debate about decolonisation?

Whether it was mainly a triumph of freedom, a tragedy of violence and division (e.g. partition), or — as most argue — a mixture of both.
Key takeaways
  • Legacies of Empire: borders, migration and memory: how empire still shapes the world.
  • Freedom brought new challenges: New nations inherited borders drawn by empires, dividing peoples and sowing conflict — partition in 1947 caused massive displacement and violence.
  • Nationalism: The belief that a people should govern themselves as an independent nation.
  • Watch out for: assuming independence solved everything