Structure and Agency

Debate how much society shapes us versus how much we shape ourselves.

  • Define and explain Structure and Agency in your own words
  • Use key terms such as Social structure accurately
  • Apply what you have learned to new examples and questions
  • Avoid the common mistakes learners make with this topic

This lesson focuses on Structure and Agency: debate how much society shapes us versus how much we shape ourselves.

Definition: Structure and Agency

Debate how much society shapes us versus how much we shape ourselves.

Key ideas

Society as a stage

Symbolic interactionists study face-to-face interaction: how people use language, gestures and symbols to negotiate meaning. Mead showed how the self develops through interaction with others, and Goffman showed how we perform different versions of ourselves for different audiences. The strength of this perspective is its insight into everyday life; its weakness is that it can neglect the big structures, like class and the economy, that constrain those performances.

Society as a living body

Functionalists, following Durkheim, compare society to a body: just as organs keep a body alive, institutions like the family, schools and religion each perform functions that keep society stable. Durkheim argued that even apparently private acts are shaped by social facts, forces outside the individual. The strength of functionalism is explaining social order; its weakness is that it can overlook conflict, inequality and social change.

Key term — Social structure: The organised patterns of relationships and institutions, such as social class, family and education, that shape how individuals behave.

Worked example: Structure and Agency

Explain the structure versus agency debate in your own words.

The debate over whether people's behaviour is mainly determined by social structures such as class and institutions, or by individuals' own choices and actions.

Answer: The debate over whether people's behaviour is mainly determined by social structures such as class and institutions, or by individuals' own choices and actions.

Common mistakes
  • Mixing up structural and action perspectives Functionalism and conflict theory are structural, macro perspectives about big forces; symbolic interactionism is an action, micro perspective about individuals. Keep the levels straight.
  • Calling Marx the founder of sociology The word sociology was coined by Auguste Comte in 1838; Marx, Durkheim and Weber are the classical founders of sociological theory, which is a different claim.

Practice

Durkheim studied suicide rates and found they varied with levels of social integration. Which perspective does this classic study support, and why?
It links a private act to a social force.

Functionalism: it shows that even suicide, seemingly the most individual act, is shaped by social facts such as integration, supporting the view of society as a constraining system.

What does a functionalist mean by a social function?
Think of organs in a body.

The contribution an institution makes to keeping society stable and orderly, like the family socialising children.

Name the three core sociological perspectives and the thinker most associated with each.
One Frenchman, one German, and one American tradition.

Functionalism, Durkheim; conflict theory, Marx; symbolic interactionism, Mead and Goffman.

A sociologist studying poverty grew up in poverty herself. Why might this be both a strength and a risk?
Think about values and objectivity.

Strength: personal insight and empathy can improve understanding. Risk: her values could bias what she notices, so she must reflect on her position and use systematic methods to stay objective.

Quick check

Structure and Agency — quick check

Which of these best defines "Social structure"?

The organised patterns of relationships and institutions, such as social class, family and education, that shape how individuals behave.

Apply conflict theory to the fact that private-school pupils are over-represented in top universities.

Conflict theorists would argue that wealthy families convert economic power into educational advantage, so the system reproduces class inequality rather than rewarding pure merit.
Key takeaways
  • Structure and Agency: debate how much society shapes us versus how much we shape ourselves.
  • Society as a stage: Symbolic interactionists study face-to-face interaction: how people use language, gestures and symbols to negotiate meaning.
  • Functionalism: The perspective, associated with Emile Durkheim, that sees society as a system whose institutions work together to keep it stable and orderly.
  • Watch out for: mixing up structural and action perspectives